Abstract
To promote CO2 utilization and protect the environment, CO2 is often employed to enhance oil recovery. Meanwhile, injection of CO2–CH4 mixtures can offer better mobility ratios and delay water breakthrough resulting in the favorable oil sweep efficiency. The gas-alternating-water (WAG) flooding in rhythmic hydrocarbon reservoirs has been studied by simulation software. The difference between water and CO2–CH4 flooding lies in the different density and viscosity among CO2, CH4, oil and water. Water tends to displace oil along the lower reservoir; inverted rhythmic reservoir may slow down the trend. CO2 and CH4 tend to displace oil along the middle-upper and upper reservoir, respectively; positive rhythmic reservoir may slow down the trend. Therefore, a homogeneous reservoir should be given priority in WAG flooding, followed by positive rhythmic reservoir.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.