Abstract

ContextThis work reports structure–property correlations of 27 zwitterions Reichardt’s types of zwitterions. Focuses are twofold, to see the (1) impacts of metamerism with Reichardt’s vs Brooker’s types of zwitterions and (2) impacts of monocyclic aromatic rings as bridges. All the molecules considered here have pyridinium (common acceptor: A) and p-phenylene-dicyanomethanide (common donor: D). Fundamental molecular properties like dipole moments (μ), polarizabilities (α), hyperpolarizabilities (β), and adiabatic absorptions were computed only for the Reichardt types and compared with the literature reported respective Brooker’s types of zwitterions. As an impact of metamerism, in general 2–3 times enhanced hyperpolarizabilities (β) were observed for Reichardt’s compared to Brooker’s types. Exceptions were observed with some triazine bridges and furan bridge, where Brooker’s types were found to be more efficient. As impacts of aromatic bridges, in general, 6–sevenfold enhanced β compared to well-known traditional bridges and enhanced β were observed compared to D-A directly connected zwitterion (benzene bridge: sixfold enhanced β). Current findings show that the aromatic bridge control with Reichardt’s types of zwitterions is more efficient and thus may be employed as an effective strategy for the designing of functional molecular chromophores for various other fundamental areas.MethodsAll computations were performed with Gaussian 09. Geometry optimizations and computations of fundamental properties were carried out with HF, B3LYP, CAM-B3LYP, and ωB97xD methodologies, with 6-31G(d,p) and aug-cc-pVDZ basis sets. For adiabatic excitations, computations were carried out using TDDFT and TDHF approaches. For the computations of the response properties (like the nonlinear optical responses), CPHF approach was used.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call