Abstract

Electrocatalytic hydrogenation is acknowledged as a promising strategy for chlorophenol dechlorination. However, the widely used Pd catalysts exhibit drawbacks, such as high costs and low selectivity for phenol hydrosaturation. Herein, we demonstrate the potential and mechanism of Ru in serving as a Pd substitute using 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) as a model pollutant. Up to 99.8% TCP removal efficiency and 99% selectivity to cyclohexanol, a value-added compound with an extremely low toxicity, were achieved on the Ru electrode. In contrast, only 66% of TCP was removed on the Pd electrode, with almost no hydrosaturation selectivity. The superiority of Ru over Pd was especially noteworthy in alkaline conditions or the presence of interfering species such as S2-. The theoretical simulation demonstrates that Ru possesses a hydrodechlorination energy barrier of 0.72 eV, which is comparable to that on Pd. Meanwhile, hydrosaturation requires an activation energy of 0.69 eV on Ru, which is much lower than that on Pd (0.92 eV). The main reaction mechanism on Ru is direct electron transfer, which is distinct from that on Pd (indirect pathway via atomic hydrogen, H*). This work thereby provides new insights into designing cost-effective electrocatalysts for halogenated phenol detoxification and resource recovery.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.