Abstract

Enhanced Gas Recovery: Factors Affecting Gas-Gas Displacement Efficiency S.S.K. Sim; S.S.K. Sim Alberta Research Council Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar A.T. Turta; A.T. Turta Alberta Research Council Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar A.K. Singhal; A.K. Singhal Alberta Research Council Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar B.F. Hawkins B.F. Hawkins Alberta Research Council Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, June 2008. Paper Number: PETSOC-2008-145 https://doi.org/10.2118/2008-145 Published: June 17 2008 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Sim, S.S.K., Turta, A.T., Singhal, A.K., and B.F. Hawkins. "Enhanced Gas Recovery: Factors Affecting Gas-Gas Displacement Efficiency." Paper presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, June 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/2008-145 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsPetroleum Society of CanadaPETSOC Canadian International Petroleum Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractThis paper is a part of a series of papers on results of Enhanced Gas Recovery (EGR) research conducted at the Alberta Research Council during 2003–2007. In this Joint Industry Project (JIP), the soundness of the concept of gas-gas displacement for enhancing gasrecovery was investigated via laboratory investigations, compositional modeling and economic analyses. The results of Phase I, gas/gas displacement tests conducted at relative high pressure and temperature (70 °C and 6.2 MPa) in 4 cm diameter 30 cm long Berea core were recently reported1,2.In the second phase (2004–2005) of the JIP, the main targets were low pressure volumetric (closed) reservoirs, in advanced stages of exploitation and also, gas bearing strata overlaying oil sand intervals. Pressure maintenance of a depleting gas reservoir by waste gas injection can serve to (1) arrest the decline in gas production rate, prevent pre-mature well abandonment and increase ultimate recovery (2) discourage the advance of aquifer (ifpresent) into the gas zone, and (3) in the case of "Gas-Over- Bitumen" situations, mitigate declining reservoir pressure during natural gas production to enable exploitation of the underlying oil sands. One example of a field application of this EGR technology was the GRIPE Project operated by Paramount Resources during 2005–2006.A series of gas/gas displacement tests was conducted at room temperature and at pressures between 0.7–3.5 MPa in the presence of connate water in 4 cm diameter × 2 m long sand-packs. Experimental parameters, such as nature of the injection gas, displacement pressure and displacement rate were systematically varied to study their effect on the displacement efficiency. Numerical simulations of the experimental results were also conducted to gain better understanding of the interrelationship between the different variables.The laboratory results showed that, during low velocity displacement of methane by flue gas in a homogeneous linear sandpack, molecular diffusion has a dominating effect on the recovery ofmarketable methane. Reasonable values of molecular diffusion coefficient for different gas/gas displacement conditions were obtained by matching the experimental test results with numerical simulation.In spite of anticipated adverse effects of mixing between displaced and displacing gas due to molecular diffusion under low pressure and low flow velocity conditions, incremental recoveries of marketable methane under the experimental conditions were encouraging and suggest that EGR by gas-gas displacement can prolong the productive life and increase natural gas recovery from many volumetric gas reservoirs.IntroductionAlberta currently has about 42,000 gas pools, which are in different stages of exploitation and many of them are approaching the end of their production life. The main goal for the second phase of our Joint Industry Project was to investigate enhanced gas recovery from low pressure volumetric (closed) reservoirs, in advanced stage of exploitation and also, from gas bearing strata overlaying oil sand intervals. Pressure maintenance of a depleting gas reservoir by waste gas injection can serve to (1) arrest the decline in gas production rate, prevent pre-mature well abandonment and increase ultimate recovery (2) discourage the advance of aquifer (if present) into the gas zone, and (3) in the case of "Gas-Over-Bitumen" situations, mitigate declining reservoir pressure during natural gas production to enable exploitation of the underlying oil sands. Keywords: breakthrough, reservoir, diffusion coefficient, gas injection method, co 2, molecular diffusion coefficient, methane recovery, displacement, flow velocity, solubility Subjects: Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Gas-injection methods This content is only available via PDF. 2008. Petroleum Society of Canada You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call