Abstract

Cross-laminated timber (CLT), an engineered wood product, has grown in popularity in the United States over the last decade due to its ease of assembly, aesthetic appeal, and potential to serve as a sustainable and renewable alternative building material. The improved robustness of CLT over light-frame timber structures has increased its potential in force-protected infrastructure that must resist blast waves and ballistic projectile penetration, but softwood CLT is typically not sufficient to fulfill standard criteria for ballistic threats. To address these threats, enhanced CLT (ECLT) composite panels were manufactured with layers of various reinforcing materials (e.g., steel, FRP) placed between wood laminations. These panels were tested against various ballistic threats during two sets of laboratory tests in order to provide a basis for future research. The first set of testing subjected laboratory-produced Southern Yellow Pine (SYP) ECLT to 84 shots of 0.50-inch (1.27 cm) steel sphere projectiles to evaluate the performance of various reinforcing materials, layups, and fastening methods. A subsequent set of tests subjected commercially produced ECLT of steel-reinforced Spruce-Pine-Fir (South) (SPF-S) to 36 shots of NATO ammunition projectiles traveling at realistic, standard striking velocities. Except for a panel using four layers of a thin and finely woven steel hardware cloth, steel reinforcement was effective in stopping projectiles from all three types of NATO ammunition fired. Ultimately considering the results of these two sets of tests, an initial cost-benefit structure was developed and discussed to compare ECLT configurations holistically, a multi-material wood analytical model framework was established and compared to experimental results, and the first ballistic experimental database for ECLT was created.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call