Abstract

The function of complex networks typically relies on the integrity of underlying structure. Sometimes, practical applications need to attack networks’ function, namely inactivate and fragment networks’ underlying structure. To effectively dismantle complex networks and regulate the function of them, a centrality measure, named CI (Morone and Makse, 2015), was proposed for node ranking. We observe that the performance of CI centrality in network disruption problem may deteriorate when it is used in networks with different topology properties. Specifically, the structural features of local network topology are overlooked in CI centrality, even though the local network topology of the nodes with a fixed CI value may have very different organization. To improve the ranking accuracy of CI, this paper proposes a variant ECI to CI by considering loop density and degree diversity of local network topology. And the proposed ECI centrality would degenerate into CI centrality with the reduction of the loop density and the degree diversity level. By comparing ECI with CI and classical centrality measures in both synthetic and real networks, the experimental results suggest that ECI can largely improve the performance of CI for network disruption. Based on the results, we analyze the correlation between the improvement and the properties of the networks. We find that the performance of ECI is positively correlated with assortative coefficient and community modularity and negatively correlated with degree inequality of networks, which can be used as guidance for practical applications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call