Enhanced Assessment of Fluid Saturation in the Wolfcamp Formation of the Permian Basin

Abstract

Conventional resistivity models often overestimate water saturation in organic-rich mudrocks and require extensive calibration efforts. Conventional resistivity-porosity-saturation models assume brine in the formation as the only conductive component contributing to resistivity measurements. They also do not reliably assimilate the spatial distribution of the clay network and pore structure. Moreover, they do not incorporate other conductive minerals and organic matter, impacting the resistivity measurements and leading to uncertainty in water saturation assessment. We recently introduced a resistivity-based model that quantitatively assimilates the type and spatial distribution of all rock constituents to improve reserves evaluation in organic-rich mudrocks using electrical resistivity measurements. This paper aims to expand the application of this model for well-log-based assessment of water/hydrocarbon saturation and to verify the reliability of the introduced method in the Wolfcamp Formation of the Permian Basin. Our recently introduced resistivity model uses pore combination modeling to incorporate conductive (clay, pyrite, kerogen, brine) and nonconductive (grains, hydrocarbon) components in estimating effective resistivity. The inputs to the model are volumetric concentrations of minerals, conductivity of rock components, and porosity obtained from laboratory measurements or interpretation of well logs. Geometric model parameters are also critical inputs to the model. To simultaneously estimate the geometric model parameters and water saturation, we developed an inversion algorithm with two objectives: (a) to estimate the geometric model parameters as inputs to the new resistivity model and (b) to estimate the water saturation. The geometric model parameters are determined for each rock type or formation by minimizing the difference between the measured resistivity and the resistivity estimated from pore combination modeling. We applied the new method to two wells drilled in the Wolfcamp Formation of the Permian Basin. The formation-based inversion showed variation in geometric model parameters, which improved the assessment of water saturation. Results demonstrated that the new method improved water saturation estimates by 24.1% and 32.4% compared to Archie’s and Waxman-Smits models, respectively, in the Wolfcamp Formation. The most considerable improvement was observed in the Middle and the Lower Wolfcamp Formations, where the average clay concentration was relatively higher than the other zones. There was an additional 70,000 bbl/acre of hydrocarbon reserve using the proposed method compared to when water saturation was quantified using Archie’s model in the Permian Basin, which is a 33% relative improvement. It should be highlighted that the new method did not require any calibration effort using core water saturation measurements, which is a unique contribution of this rock-physics-based workflow.