Abstract

Key points There are two subtypes of trimeric intracellular cation (TRIC) channels but their distinct single‐channel properties and physiological regulation have not been characterized. We examined the differences in function between native skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) K+‐channels from wild‐type (WT) mice (where TRIC‐A is the principal subtype) and from Tric‐a knockout (KO) mice that only express TRIC‐B.We find that lone SR K+‐channels from Tric‐a KO mice have a lower open probability and gate more frequently in subconducting states than channels from WT mice but, unlike channels from WT mice, multiple channels gate with high open probability with a more than six‐fold increase in activity when four channels are present in the bilayer.No evidence was found for a direct gating interaction between ryanodine receptor and SR K+‐channels in Tric‐a KO SR, suggesting that TRIC‐B–TRIC‐B interactions are highly specific and may be important for meeting counterion requirements during excitation–contraction coupling in tissues where TRIC‐A is sparse or absent. The trimeric intracellular cation channels, TRIC‐A and TRIC‐B, represent two subtypes of sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) K+‐channel but their individual functional roles are unknown. We therefore compared the biophysical properties of SR K+‐channels derived from the skeletal muscle of wild‐type (WT) or Tric‐a knockout (KO) mice. Because TRIC‐A is the major TRIC‐subtype in skeletal muscle, WT SR will predominantly contain TRIC‐A channels, whereas Tric‐a KO SR will only contain TRIC‐B channels. When lone SR K+‐channels were incorporated into bilayers, the open probability (Po) of channels from Tric‐a KO mice was markedly lower than that of channels from WT mice; gating was characterized by shorter opening bursts and more frequent brief subconductance openings. However, unlike channels from WT mice, the Po of SR K+‐channels from Tric‐a KO mice increased as increasing channel numbers were present in the bilayer, driving the channels into long sojourns in the fully open state. When co‐incorporated into bilayers, ryanodine receptor channels did not directly affect the gating of SR K+‐channels, nor did the presence or absence of SR K+‐channels influence ryanodine receptor activity. We suggest that because of high expression levels in striated muscle, TRIC‐A produces most of the counterion flux required during excitation‐contraction coupling. TRIC‐B, in contrast, is sparsely expressed in most cells and, although lone TRIC‐B channels exhibit low Po, the high Po levels reached by multiple TRIC‐B channels may provide a compensatory mechanism to rapidly restore K+ gradients and charge differences across the SR of tissues containing few TRIC‐A channels.

Highlights

  • Intracellular Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) depends primarily on two types of Ca2+ release channel, the ryanodine receptor (RyR) and the inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R)

  • The typical features of SR K+-channel gating are shown in Fig. 1A for channels derived from WT or Tric-a KO mice

  • We investigated this in more detail and found that, at both positive and negative holding potentials, the openings to the full open state contributed significantly less to the overall Po of channels from Tric-a KO mice compared to that observed for channels from WT mice (Fig. 2B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intracellular Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) depends primarily on two types of Ca2+ release channel, the ryanodine receptor (RyR) and the inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R). In skeletal and cardiac muscle, where rapid release of large amounts of SR Ca2+ are required to cause muscle contraction, RyR is the main pathway for Ca2+ release and the isoforms participating are primarily RyR1 in skeletal and RyR2 in cardiac muscle (Bers 2001). The positive charge that moves out of the SR/ER as Ca2+ is released must be compensated for by counterion movement to maintain the SR/ER membrane potential near 0 mV. Following the Ca2+ release process, any participating counterion must be re-equilibrated across the SR and charge compensation is again required as Ca2+

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.