Abstract

Scholars seek to articulate plausible explanations for the current world situation where the vast majority of countries are underdeveloped while a relatively small portion- the Western countries, are   rich. From the classical Marxist analysis emerged the neo-Marxists, encompassing the Third World scholars theorizing on the persistence of this division and development alternatives. Their central argument is ‘development of underdevelopment’ which forms the main strand of the dependency theory. However with the emergence of Brazil and China as global giants and the pervasive economic in-roads to Africa, a shift on Africa’s dependency on the global north seems inevitable. Is a “new dependency” emerging or is Africa developing and catching up to rise beyond a new dependency? This paper seeks to engage in the ongoing perennial debate on Africa’s dependency. It presents a critique of the dependency theory and argues that an inevitable economic growth of China will not only upturn the regional presence of America in Africa but will create a “new” relationship through Chinese soft technology-the new media and globalization. However the crux of the argument is whether this will in turn develop Africa or foster a new dependency within the global South. To interrogate these assumptions, this paper adopts international political economy (IPE) approach as a methodology to examine China/Africa relationship using post colonial tools of analysis.     Key words: Dependency, development, globalization, underdevelopment, modernization, poverty, Africa.

Highlights

  • No issue is more central in the ongoing debate on Africa’s development than Western economic imperialism

  • The understanding of the development of underdevelopment in contemporary Africa is made plausible with the international political economy (IPE) approach

  • Michael Veseth contend that International Political Economy (IPE) is the rapidly developing social science field of study that attempts to understand international and global problems using an eclectic interdisciplinary array of analytical tools and theoretical perspectives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

No issue is more central in the ongoing debate on Africa’s development than Western economic imperialism. This shift is understandable as the emerging industrialized nations of Brazil and China takes toll in the international system. This informs an analysis of new forms of dependency in the global South which perhaps is already constraining the economic adjustment and the democratization process in Africa. According to Moss, “U.S Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has, to her credit, visited fifteen African countries on four separate trips. Her presence has been overshadowed by President Obama’s absence. Even Obama’s most vocal supporters quietly admit that he has done much less with Africa than previous presidents have” (Moss, 2012:1)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call