Abstract

While the alternative transcription and splicing mechanisms have long been known for some genes like oncogenes, their prevalence in almost all multi-exon genes has been recently realized with the increasing application of high-throughput experimental methods, named Next Generation RNA Sequencing (NGS). Henceforth, understanding the regulation of these processes in comparisons between cell types and cancer requests, sensitive and specific bioinformatics as well as bio-statistic approaches, that is, Cufflinks/Cuffdiff, DEXseq and RESEM, detecting gene transcript/isoforms and exons abundance is necessary. Isoforms and exons expression analysis by NGS is complicated by several sources of measurement variability causing numerous statistical defies. Here, with the purpose of minimizing this statistical challenge, we integrated both Cufflinks/Cuffdiff and DEXseq bioinformatics approaches assessing whole alternative splicing (AS) events, focusing on alternative transcripts regulation and their exons modulation respectively, by processing our previous prepared Estrogen Receptor β (Erβ+ and Erβ-) breast cancer (BC) cells, stimulated by estradiol (E2). Results showed that Estradiol (E2) induced Erβ+ BC (Erβ+E2), exhibited dissimilar reply as opposed to the other’s analyzed BC cell lines in terms of intragenic, exons and junction reads count ratio. Relationship analysis between expressed genes and transcript isoforms, suggested a substantial role of alternative promoters in AS event occurrence in Erβ+ BC as opposed to Erβ- BC. Indeed, merging Cufflinks/Cuffdiff and DEXseq approaches, 79 multi-exon genes were detected as statistically differentially modulated (spliced) in Erβ+ hormone induced BC cell line, and around 38% of these spliced genes claimed to be induced by alternative promoters. The present survey discriminated between several cancer specific alternative splicing genes like LIFR a BC metastasis suppressor, PBX1 a pioneer factor defining aggressive Erβ- BC and PHLPP2 a tumor suppressor, as exhibiting significant exon modulation in early AS occurrence in hormone responsive Erβ+ BC exclusively. Although, our findings supported dissimilar reply comparing both Cuflinks/Cuffdiff and DEXseq approaches called AS events, it is noteworthy to underline their relative agreement, evaluating spliced genes functional annotation as well as their complementarity performing whole AS survey. This study therefore proposed the integration between Cufflinks/Cuffdiff and DEXseq tools as a reasonable complementary methodology assessing full AS pattern in hormone responsive Erβ BC cells. Key words: Cufflinks/Cuffdiff, DEXseq, RNA-Seq, alternative splicing (AS), exons, transcript isoforms, estrogen receptor β (ERβ), breast cancer (BC) cells.

Highlights

  • Alternative splicing is a central cellular process that produces different mRNA transcript isoforms from a single gene

  • We performed a gene ontology (GO) survey (FDR ≤0.05 with at least 2 fold enrichment) by processing significantly differentially spliced genes, evaluating alternative transcript and exon change and/or modulation in multi-exon genes. Reads sequences from both Erβ+ and Erβ- human BC cell line models high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) statistical analysis mRNA sequencing experiment basing on illumina genome analyzer II (GAII) processing both Erβ+ and Erβhormone induced breast cancer (BC) cell lines, yielded approximately 94911602-99876796 million pair-end read (101 bp) sequences (Table 1)

  • The present result supported that Erβ+ and Erβ- BC cell lines in normal conditions (Erβ+noE2, Erβ-noE2) as well as Erβ- BC cell line induced by E2 (Erβ- E2), exhibited the same behaviors as opposed to Erβ+E2 breast cancer cell reacting to E2 induction (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Alternative splicing is a central cellular process that produces different mRNA transcript isoforms from a single gene. Existing well-established methods detect alternative splicing process mainly by considering sequencing reads that map uniquely to single isoforms or by assembling transcripts and estimating the most likely isoform abundance levels according to the given sequencing reads (Jeffrey and Zhong, 2011).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call