Abstract

This paper analyses how the President of the Philippines, Benigno Simeon Aquino III, or simply PNoy, deployed persons, time, location and social relationships in the English translation of his October 30 th televised national address and what meaning and effect does such deployment of referring expressions bring about in understanding the nature of the political speech. Using the frameworks of Hanks (2005) and Buhler (1934), this paper examines how, PNoy strategically sets up the deictic field by placing several personal, temporal, spatial and social deictic expressions in what initially is a ground zero. The deployment creates a deictic field in which the Filipino people are situated at deictic centre and the President and his critics are in binary opposition. PNoy’s deployment of deictic expressions is very effectively done so that the deictic centre is persuaded to judge the president and his government favourably and the binary opposite in the deictic field, unfavourably. Through a systematic stylistic account of deixis in political speech, this paper argues that not only personal deixis, as previous studies put forth, but also temporal, spatial and social deixis helps political actors to persuade the audience in their favour and ultimately boost leverage in their political discourse and outside. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2002-01 Keywords: deictic expressions; deictic field; ground zero; language in politics; stylistic analysis

Highlights

  • Political speeches by various political actors and in different contexts have been widely investigated in various linguistic fields

  • Besides consistent findings with previous studies on the category of personal deixis, the present study provides a case in which other categories of deixis further strengthens what is initially fleshed out by personal deictic expressions

  • The present study explores President Benigno Aquino III‘s use of deictic expressions in the English translation of his October 30, 2013 speech through stylistic analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Political speeches by various political actors and in different contexts have been widely investigated in various linguistic fields. Stylistics as a field of linguistic inquiry traces its roots in the examination of language as used in literary pieces, a number of political speeches have already been subjected to stylistic analyses (Adetunji 2006, Suzuki & Kageura 2008, Kaylor 2011, Sheveleva 2012, Abuya 2012, Naz, Alvi & Baseer 2012, Ayeomoni 2012, Oluremi 2013) These stylistic studies on political speeches point to the compatibility of stylistic tools in the systematic explication of meaning and effect even of non-literary texts.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call