Abstract

The tradition of reflective teaching has been around for thirty-four years since Schӧn (1983) first proposed the notion of reflective practice. Many studies heavily rely on written genres in the investigation of teachers’ reflective practices. Thematic categories were threshed out through content and descriptive analyses. However, these themes were not culled from the clauses of mental processes employed by the teachers to express their inner world of experiences. This exploratory study proposed the transitivity model in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to generate the mental processes from reflection papers. Initial papers with 17,937 word tokens were produced by 28 teachers of English enrolled in a writing course. All processes were generated by UAM Corpus Tool. The themes generated from the Phenomena felt, thought of, sensed, desired, and perceived by the Senser were culled using content analysis. Results show that teachers are still boxed within the default material and relational processes. Results demonstrate that they employed higher mental types of sensing such as cognitive and desiderative. Based on the Phenomena, the top themes include: (1) commendations for the course professor, (2) writing process, its challenges, nature, and concepts, and (3) actual classroom experiences, learnings, and the subject. Although the results corroborate with the themes identified in previous studies, these present themes may be treated as valid and more realistic views and dimensions of reflective practices. This exploratory study suggests that the Phenomenon in the mental processes may be an ideal situs of looking into teachers’ human internal affairs as reflective practitioners. Keywords: reflective pedagogy; reflection; transitivity; Systemic Functional Linguistics; teacher education

Highlights

  • IntroductionThis can be traced back to Dewey’s (1933) assertion of the three types of action such as impulsive action, routine action, and reflective action

  • The rise of reflective teaching may not be considered as a new phenomenon

  • It is important to situate this study in the background of transitivity model in Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) propounded by Halliday

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This can be traced back to Dewey’s (1933) assertion of the three types of action such as impulsive action, routine action, and reflective action By reflection, he means any belief or any supposed form of knowledge that is marked with active, persistent and careful consideration. Halliday (2014) maintains that there are three-fold meta-functions in a language which are all embedded in a vast linguistic system that conveys specific meanings They include ideational, textual, and interpersonal system. The ideational meanings considered the first stratum of the three layers become the focus of discussion as it involves how reality is represented in language This involves two main systems, namely: transitivity and ergativity. Transitivity is the main system employed in this present study

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call