Abstract
The ability to discriminate germplasm is important for plant breeding as well as for plant variety protection. To achieve this, plant breeders have been using molecular, physiological and biochemical markers in discriminating and grouping of genotypes. Breeders have been looking for effective, quick and cheaper ways of grouping germplasm. Therefore this study was carried out to assess the ability of the traits used for determining the distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) of new plant varieties and agro-morphological characteristics for differentiating Southern African maize inbreds. In this study, 18 maize inbred lines were assessed for their variation based on 25 agronomic and 12 DUS traits. The maize inbred lines were grouped differently based on qualitative or quantitative traits or when combined. The correlation between the qualitative and quantitative similarity matrices was low (r=0.048) and non-significant. This indicated that both qualitative and quantitative traits should be used for effective maize inbred line discrimination. Both qualitative and quantitative similarity matrices were highly significantly (p<0.001) and highly correlated to mixed data (r=0.82 and r=0.61 respectively). The grouping of the inbred lines based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was similar to the similarity matrix of the mixed data. The first principal component, which explained 27.8% of the total variation, was due to grain yield and productive parameters. The second component, explaining 13.2% of the total variation was due to number of tassel branches (TBNo) and tassel length (TL). The Shannon diversity index showed that the inbred lines were diverse in days to silking, ear diameter, days to maturity, shelling percentage and leaf colour. It is concluded that for effective discrimination of maize inbred lines both agro-morphological and DUS traits should be used especially when few inbreds are being considered. Key words: Maize (Zea mays L.), cluster analysis, repeatability, phenotypic characterisation, distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) traits.
Highlights
IntroductionThe development of inbred lines and identification of their best hybrid combinations is critical in an inbred-hybrid oriented breeding programme (Ristanovic et al, 1987)
The development of inbred lines and identification of their best hybrid combinations is critical in an inbred-hybrid oriented breeding programme (Ristanovic et al, 1987).the process of developing and selecting inbred lines is costly and time-consuming as extensive yield trials are required to evaluate F1 performance to identify the parental lines combinations
A wide range of expression was observed for 25 agronomic traits studied
Summary
The development of inbred lines and identification of their best hybrid combinations is critical in an inbred-hybrid oriented breeding programme (Ristanovic et al, 1987). The process of developing and selecting inbred lines is costly and time-consuming as extensive yield trials are required to evaluate F1 performance to identify the parental lines combinations. Breeders make several crosses and evaluate the F1 to identify inbred lines that are heterotic. In this case, inbred lines with desirable agronomic traits are selected for hybridisation and are maintained (Bertan et al, 2007). Phenotypic diversity of parental lines is necessary to achieve high heterosis in hybrids. A breeding programme with diverse inbred lines is most likely to deliver superior hybrids
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
