Abstract
Polyethylene (PE) films are widely used in packaging. PE is a thermoplastic manufactured from nonrenewable petroleum resources. Due to its non–biodegradability, its films have posed serious pollution problems e.g. visual pollution, blockage of gutters and drains, choking of animals etc. Suitable replacements for PE films especially for single use only, are the starch based thermoplastics such as Polylactic acid (PLA) which are fully biodegradable. This paper reports a comparison of the viscoelastic properties of commercially obtained PLA and PE films, and the degradation of the same under a composting environment. The storage and loss moduli of PLA and PE films were determined using the Dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) model 2980. The elastic modulus of PLA was found to be 2222.87 MPa at 50EsC and amplitude of 10 μm. This is higher than that of PE which was found to be 236.69 MPa at the same temperature and amplitude. Analysis of composting samples over a time span of 36 days indicated a rapid loss of storage modulus of PLA with that of PE remaining fairly constant. Overall, the results suggest that PLA is a suitable substitute for PE in as far as technical performance and degradability is concerned. Key words: Polylactic acid, polyethylene, modulus, biodegradable, degradation.
Highlights
Environmental conservation is undoubtedly one of the top priorities in the world today
This paper reports a comparison of the viscoelastic properties of commercially obtained Polylactic acid (PLA) and PE films, and the degradation of the same under a composting environment
PLA films of thickness 20 μm were obtained from Polyfilms limited, France, while PE films of the same thickness were sourced from Pil, Kenya Ltd
Summary
Environmental conservation is undoubtedly one of the top priorities in the world today. Over 60% of plastic waste is produced by households, most of it as single use packaging (Scott, 1999). PE bags are light and have good barrier properties against water and waterborne organisms. These properties make them suitable for protecting commodities from the environment. Energy requirements for production of PE as compared to other materials such as aluminium, steel, glass and paper are much lower. The effluents emitted e.g. sulphur (iv) oxide, oxides of nitrogen, Carbon (ii) oxide, and dust during manufacture of paper bags from trees compared to PE are much higher (Scott, 1999)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
