Abstract

This study aimed to perform economic analysis and evaluate the effect of technological parameters on plant and ratoon sugarcane under irrigation depths for ethanol production. Treatments were irrigation of 30, 60, 90, and 120% of ETc and a control treatment (no irrigation). The experimental design was a randomized block with six repetitions. We used a drip irrigation system with management based on crop evapotranspiration, according to the methodology proposed by FAO. In rainfed and under irrigation plant cane, the variable cost represented 54.40 and 66.81% and the fixed cost represented 45.60 and 33.19%, respectively. The difference in the cost of production in rainfed and irrigated was 27.23 and 57.20%, for the plant cane and ratoon, respectively. Moreover, we presented the economic viability, which for sugarcane grown in rainfed is 60% of ETc, with differences in the cost of production and net profit of 53.94 and 52.20%, and financial return in the year of implementation and 4 years and 4 months, respectively. The irrigation increased technological parameters for ethanol production. For plant cane, the only variable that showed no statistically significant difference was the fiber, and for ratoon cane the technological parameters did not have statistically significant difference. Key words: Saccharum, drip irrigation, financial indicators, ratoon cane, plant cane, dryland.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to perform the economic analysis and evaluate the effect of technological parameters of sugarcane cultivated for ethanol production under different irrigation depths, using a drip irrigation system

  • These differences were possibly influenced by the period of the crop cycle and climatic conditions of the region, but the irrigation depths applied were similar in both growing seasons

  • The sugarcane grown in rainfed and irrigated with 60% ETc had economic viability with financial return in the year of implementation and 4 years and 4 months, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In this period, the ethanol production triggered relevant socioeconomic impacts such as increasing rural income, employment generation, reducing dependence on foreign oil, and the increase of Brazilian balance of trade (Negrão and Urban, 2005). The ethanol prices have never been so high, even equal or higher than gasoline because of transportation costs (away from ethanol plants located in São Paulo), where 70% of Brazilian ethanol is produced (Colussi, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.