Abstract
The study set out to evaluate the relationship between sectoral Aid for Trade (AfTS) and sectoral exports within East Africa – represented by the East African Community partner states including Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. The Estimation method used was the Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equation (SURE) model. The SURE estimation results show a positive significant relationship between AfTS and exports from the agriculture, manufacturing and services sectors in the East Africa Region, implying that the initiative has and continues to foster the growth of exports from the region. This relationship however is inelastic, implying that percentage increases in aid disbursed lead to smaller percentage increase in sectoral exports. The results also show a highly significant, positive and elastic relationship between value addition and exports. Other regressors like regulatory quality and corruption control also show a higher impact on exports than AFTS. This shows that while AfTS can contribute to improved export performance, improvements in value addition, the quality of the regulatory environment, and the level of corruption control are equally or even more important in facilitating export growth. From the correlation coefficients between the sectors, all the three sectors are positively correlated. It can also be seen that the greatest correlations exist between the manufacturing sector and the agriculture sector, which could be because the countries in the study –from East Africa are mainly agriculture exporters, with a lot of inputs feeding from the agriculture sectors to the manufacturing sectors. Key words: Aid for trade, sectoral exports, seemingly unrelated regression model.  
Highlights
The Aid for Trade (AfT) initiative was instituted at the 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Conference, as a funding mechanism to trade and trade-related activities, to boost trade in developing countries and least developed countries (LDCs)
UNDP (1997), places the estimates of the loss made by sub-Saharan Africa as a result of the Uruguay round at US$ 1.2 billion; Finger and Schuler (2000) estimated that it would cost each developing country US$ 150 million to cover just three implementation costs- Trade Related aspects of Intellectual Property rights (TRIPS), sanitary and phytosanitary measures and customs valuation, while, according to Stiglitz (2005), it was estimated that the 48 LDCs had lost a total of US$ 600 million a year as a result of the Uruguay round
The study set out to evaluate the relationship between AfTS and sectoral exports within the East Africa Region, represented by five of the countries that make up the EAC
Summary
The Aid for Trade (AfT) initiative was instituted at the 2005 Hong Kong Ministerial Conference, as a funding mechanism to trade and trade-related activities, to boost trade in developing countries and least developed countries (LDCs). VA is the sector specific value added, TO is trade openness, FD represents financial development of the exporting country, REER represents the real effective exchange rate.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
