Abstract

Educational change and reform initiatives currently prevailing at global, national, and local levels seem to require school systems and school leaders to be instructionally focused. A focus on instructional leadership seems to entail, among other things, restructuring of the schools’ instructional leadership system in a way that can actively respond to the call for promoting quality teaching and learning, and thereby enhancing the efforts in addressing quality education for all. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to explain and describe the differences between principal’s and teachers’ perceptions and understandings of instructional leadership at Birakat Primary School. Questionnaires and interviews were used with the principal, along with two teachers from the 1st cycle grades and two teachers from the 2nd cycle grades. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively and aggregated to examine the respondents’ perceptions on instructional leadership. The findings revealed a few differences between the principal’s and teachers’ perceptions. There was no consensus on the time frame a principal should spend on instructional leadership; none of the teachers chose the same time frame as the principal did. Another difference was with the definition of instructional leadership. Teachers focused on personal characteristics to define an instructional leader, whereas the principal defined instructional leadership focusing on the activities he has to accomplish in enhancing instruction. A third difference was observed on the impact of the instructional leader on a school. In this regard, the principal focused on establishing school culture where by the school community develops shared belief that students’ learning is the first priority of the school, whereas the teachers emphasized the professional or supervisory support teachers must get from the principal. The implications of these findings seemed to indicate the need for school educators to engage in clear communication and continuous professional dialogue about the responsibilities of the principal. Also, the policies and procedures need to be put in place to provide the necessary professional development for enhancing both principals’ and teachers’ orientations of how to effectively and efficiently lead the teaching-learning at schools so that the targets for providing quality education for all would likely be reachable. Key words: Culture, instruction, leadership, perception.

Highlights

  • IntroductionIn strengthening the focus given to leading educational institutions or schools, Article 3.8 of the 1994 Ethiopian Education and Training Policy promised that educational management will be professional, and educational institutions will be autonomous in their internal administration

  • There was no consensus on the time frame a principal should spend on instructional leadership; none of the teachers chose the same time frame as the principal did

  • Teachers focused on personal characteristics to define an instructional leader, whereas the principal defined instructional leadership focusing on the activities he has to accomplish in enhancing instruction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In strengthening the focus given to leading educational institutions or schools, Article 3.8 of the 1994 Ethiopian Education and Training Policy promised that educational management will be professional, and educational institutions will be autonomous in their internal administration It has been indicated in the policy that institutional autonomy should include designing and implementing of education and training programs with the necessary involvement of concerned stakeholders who are expected to take part at the different levels of the decentralized educational management system. One rationale stated for decentralization was to bring about accountability and decisionmaking close to the schools (MOE, 2006) This has paved the way to formally recognize the professionalism, expertise and competence of those who work in individual schools, principals, to make decisions in improving the quality of teaching and learning. All the assertions specified in the respective sub section of article 3.8 seem to demonstrate the commitment of the Ethiopian government in that educational institutions should be led by professionals who have the necessary orientations in how to deal with issues of quality teaching and learning

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.