Abstract
The application of the evasion principle by Lord Sumption in Petrodel v Prest is critically inspected and investigated to highlight how the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil has been applied by the English Courts. To this end, it is pinpointed that the scope of the doctrine has been narrowed, and the courts frequently misinterpreted the evasion principle, as evinced by the recent case Akhemodova v Akhemdov and Wood v Baker
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
