Abstract

Moral responsibility is one of the core concepts in engineering ethics and consequently in most engineering ethics education. Yet, despite a growing awareness that engineers should be trained to become more sensitive to cultural differences, most engineering ethics education is still based on Western approaches. In this article, we discuss the notion of responsibility in Confucianism and explore what a Confucian perspective could add to the existing engineering ethics literature. To do so, we analyse the Citicorp case, a widely discussed case in the existing engineering ethics literature, from a Confucian perspective. Our comparison suggests the following. When compared to virtue ethics based on Aristotle, Confucianism focuses primarily on ethical virtues; there is no explicit reference to intellectual virtues. An important difference between Confucianism and most western approaches is that Confucianism does not define clear boundaries of where a person’s responsibility end. It also suggests that the gap between Western and at least one Eastern approach, namely Confucianism, can be bridged. Although there are differences, the Confucian view and a virtue-based Western view on moral responsibility have much in common, which allows for a promising base for culturally inclusive ethics education for engineers.

Highlights

  • Engineering has found its way into all areas of human activity and has become one of the potential driving forces behind global economic development and the creation of new industries

  • On the most abstract level, responsibility in Confucianism is aimed at harmony and all actions are instrumental to achieving harmony

  • When compared to virtue ethics based on Aristotle, Confucianism focuses primarily on ethical virtues; there is no explicit reference to intellectual virtues

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Engineering has found its way into all areas of human activity and has become one of the potential driving forces behind global economic development and the creation of new industries. Engineers in various industries contribute to the development of new technologies that influence and shape the way we live, in both anticipated and unanticipated ways (Murphy et al 2015). Engineering may pose risks for public safety, health and welfare. Health and welfare, engineers are responsible for carrying out their work competently and skilfully but they must be aware of the broader ethical and social implications of engineering and be able to reflect on these issues (Van de Poel and Royakkers 2011; Doorn and Kroesen 2013). It is widely recognised that this awareness should be cultivated early on in the education of prospective engineers (Zandvoort et al 2013)

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.