Abstract

Intravehicular wireless sensor network (IVWSN) is a cutting edge research topic that delivers cost reduction, assembly, and maintenance efficiency by removing the wiring harnesses within the vehicle and enables the integration of new sensors into the locations inside a vehicle where cable connection is not possible. Providing energy efficiency through the low-duty-cycle operation and high reliability by exploiting the large bandwidth, ultrawideband (UWB) has been determined to be the most appropriate technology for IVWSNs. We investigate the UWB channel model for IVWSNs within the engine compartment of a vehicle by collecting an extensive amount of data for 19 × 19 links for different types and conditions of the vehicle. These include a Fiat Linea with engine off, Fiat Linea with engine on, and Peugeot Bipper with engine off. The path-loss exponent is estimated to be around 3.5 without exhibiting much variation when the engine is turned on and for different types of vehicles. The power variation around the expected path loss has lognormal distribution with zero mean and standard deviation in the range of [5.5, 6.3] dB for different types of vehicles with almost no variation when the engine of the same vehicle is turned on. The clustering phenomenon in the power delay profile (PDP) is well represented by a modified Saleh-Valenzuela (SV) model. The interarrival times of the clusters are modeled using a Weibull distribution. The cluster-amplitude and ray-amplitude decay functions are represented with a dual-slope linear model with breakpoint around 26.6 and 5.5 ns, respectively. The parameters of the Weibull distribution and these dual-slope linear models do not vary significantly for different types and conditions of the vehicle. The variations of the observed PDPs around the SV model is well modeled by independent normal random variables with zero mean and with a variance independent of the delay bin, and the type and condition of the vehicle. We propose a simulation model for the UWB channel within the engine compartment based on these findings and validate it by comparing the received energy and root mean square (RMS) delay spread of the generated and observed PDPs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call