Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessCommentsEngel’s What? A Response to Gan and VernonAngus Deaton and Christina PaxsonAngus DeatonPrinceton University Search for more articles by this author and Christina PaxsonPrinceton University Search for more articles by this author Princeton UniversityPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 111, Number 6December 2003 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/378535 Views: 105Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref © 2003 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:K. V. Kuznetsov Monitoring of The Consumption Level for Sustainable Development Goals, Statistics and Economics 19, no.11 (Mar 2022): 18–27.https://doi.org/10.21686/2500-3925-2022-1-18-27John Gibson, Bonggeun Kim Economies of scale, bulk discounts, and liquidity constraints: comparing unit value and transaction level evidence in a poor country, Review of Economics of the Household 16, no.11 (Sep 2017): 21–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-017-9388-7Thomas F. Crossley, Yuqian Lu Returns to scale in food preparation and the Deaton–Paxson puzzle, Review of Economics of the Household 16, no.11 (Dec 2017): 5–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-017-9399-4Federico Gutierrez A Sharing Model of the Household: Explaining the Deaton-Paxson Paradox and Computing Household Indifference Scales, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098290Eve Colson-Sihra, Clement Bellet The Conspicuous Consumption of the Poor: Forgoing Calories for Aspirational Goods, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3270814Maneka Jayasinghe, Andreas Chai, Shyama Ratnasiri, Christine Smith The power of the vegetable patch: How home-grown food helps large rural households achieve economies of scale & escape poverty, Food Policy 73 (Dec 2017): 62–74.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.09.005Donald F. Vitaliano A note on the ‘food paradox’: some contradictory evidence, Review of Economics of the Household 13, no.44 (Jun 2013): 1043–1053.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9206-9José Heleno Faro Cobb-Douglas preferences under uncertainty, Economic Theory 54, no.22 (Jan 2013): 273–285.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-012-0738-7Alejandrina Salcedo, Todd Schoellman, Michèle Tertilt Families as roommates: Changes in U.S. household size from 1850 to 2000, Quantitative Economics 3, no.11 (Mar 2012): 133–175.https://doi.org/10.3982/QE76TREVON D. LOGAN ECONOMIES OF SCALE IN THE HOUSEHOLD: PUZZLES AND PATTERNS FROM THE AMERICAN PAST, Economic Inquiry 49, no.44 (Mar 2010): 1008–1028.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00240.xR. Godoy, E. A. Undurraga, D. Wilkie, V. Reyes-García, T. Huanca, W. R. Leonard, T. McDade, S. Tanner, V. Vadez, The effect of wealth and real income on wildlife consumption among native Amazonians in Bolivia: estimates of annual trends with longitudinal household data (2002-2006), Animal Conservation 13, no.33 (Nov 2010): 265–274.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00330.xDavid Jacobson, Petroula M. Mavrikiou, Christos Minas Household size, income and expenditure on food: The case of Cyprus, The Journal of Socio-Economics 39, no.22 (Apr 2010): 319–328.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.009Timothy J. Halliday Mismeasured Household Size and its Implications for the Identification of Economies of Scale, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 72, no.22 (Apr 2010): 246–262.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00570.xPeter Lanjouw, Rinku Murgai Poverty decline, agricultural wages, and nonfarm employment in rural India: 1983-2004, Agricultural Economics 40, no.22 (Mar 2009): 243–263.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00373.xSanae Tashiro Differences in Food Preparation by Race and Ethnicity: Evidence from the American Time Use Survey, The Review of Black Political Economy 36, no.3-43-4 (Jan 2009): 161–180.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-009-9045-3Federico Perali The second Engel law: Is it a paradox?, European Economic Review 52, no.88 (Nov 2008): 1353–1377.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.01.005John Gibson, Bonggeun Kim Measurement Error in Recall Surveys and the Relationship between Household Size and Food Demand, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89, no.22 (May 2007): 473–489.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00978.x

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.