Abstract

Engaging knowledge users (KUs) as research team members throughout the research process helps generate relevant knowledge and may improve uptake of research results. The purpose of this article is to describe how an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach was embedded within a master’s thesis project comprising a mixed-methods systematic review. KUs were engaged in four distinct phases of the systematic review process, including (1) proposal development; (2) development of the research question and approach; (3) creation of an advisory panel; and (4) an end of study meeting to interpret findings and plan dissemination of findings. The extent of each KU’s engagement on the research team fluctuated during the study. Challenges included maintaining the same KUs throughout the project and maintaining the scope of the project to align with a master’s thesis. Our suggestions for optimizing graduate student iKT projects include having regular team meetings and periodically checking in with team members to encourage reflection on overall engagement and progress of the project. Overall, KUs helped create a research project designed to address their needs and provided input on how results might translate into implications for clinical practice, education, academic policy, and future research within their respective contexts.

Highlights

  • Health-related research should inform the delivery of health services, yet translation of research findings into meaningful practice change is difficult.[1]

  • Graham and colleagues report that using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach when conducting systematic reviews can lead to better uptake of research results, because the people for whom the results are pertinent are engaged throughout the process, ensuring the research is targeted to their needs.[1]

  • knowledge users (KUs) team members changed during the study as some left the team and others joined it

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health-related research should inform the delivery of health services, yet translation of research findings into meaningful practice change is difficult.[1]. This approach to research proposes collaboration between researchers and KUs, in an attempt to achieve societal impact, where research results inform KU decisions (including clinicians, managers, policy-makers, patients, etc).[1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call