Engaging communities in changing the environment to promote transport-related walking: Evaluation of route use in the ‘Fitter for Walking’ project

Emma J Adams,Nick Cavill

doi:10.1016/j.jth.2015.09.002

Emma J Adams, Nick Cavill

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2015.09.002

Copy DOI

Abstract

Abstract Promoting walking for transport may help to increase physical activity levels. Associations between the built environment and walking for transport have been well reported. Engaging communities in making small-scale changes to local routes is one potential low-cost strategy to improve neighbourhood environments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in pedestrian use of local routes following environmental changes made by communities and local authorities (LAs) in the ‘Fitter for Walking’ (FFW) project, to assess route users’ awareness of the environmental improvements which were implemented and to make recommendations for future evaluation. FFW targeted deprived communities in twelve LA areas in England. Coordinators worked with communities and LA partners to improve local route environments based on identified barriers to walking. Route user counts and intercept surveys were conducted in five FFW case studies at baseline, 12 months and 14–20 months after the project activities had commenced. A wide range of environmental improvements were undertaken. After 12 months, there was a decrease in pedestrian route use overall (−19.4%) and in four case studies (range −42.1% to −10.4%). However, after 14–20 months, an increase in pedestrian route user overall (14.9%) and in all case studies (range 5.4–58.9%) was observed compared to baseline. Route users’ awareness of environmental improvements made to routes varied across case studies and was very low for some of the improvements which had been made. Engaging communities in making small-scale environmental improvements to key routes in local neighbourhoods may be an effective, low-cost strategy for increasing walking for transport. Increasing the number of people walking on newly improved routes may take a long time and require additional promotional initiatives. Evaluating these types of initiatives is challenging. These factors should be considered by health and transport professionals developing initiatives and by researchers interested in measuring behaviour change.

Highlights

Engaging communities in making small-scale environmental improvements to key routes in local neighbourhoods may be an effective, low-cost strategy for increasing walking for transport
Recommendations have been made for changes to the built and natural environment to ensure local services and facilities are accessible on foot and to support walking by offering convenient, safe and attractive access to workplaces, homes, schools and other public facilities (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2008a)
A variety of environmental changes were made by the local authority partner, members of the group registered with the project, local community residents and volunteers (Table 2)

Summary

Introduction

Engaging communities in making small-scale environmental improvements to key routes in local neighbourhoods may be an effective, low-cost strategy for increasing walking for transport. In the face of cuts in public funding, low-cost approaches to improving the local environment to support walking need to be considered One such approach is to target specific geographic areas, for example key local routes within a neighbourhood, and to instigate smaller scale changes to the built and natural environment which can be made relatively quickly. One study was identified which assessed the effectiveness of using a community engagement approach to instigate these types of changes to attributes of the environment on local routes (Krieger et al, 2009) Using this approach may be important for making rapid and relevant changes to the local environment to promote walking without the need for high levels of investment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in pedestrian use of local routes following environmental changes made by communities and local authorities in five case study sites in the ‘Fitter for Walking’ project, to assess route users’ awareness of the environmental improvements which were implemented and to outline the challenges of evaluating these types of initiatives and provide recommendations for future evaluation

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion