Abstract
• State-owned enterprises can function as an instrument to enforce government policy. • The one child policy reduced people’s fertility for those working in state-owned than in non-state-owned enterprises. • There is no significant difference in fertility desire between people working in state-owned and non-state-owned enterprises. • The findings are not due to other confounding events such as the opening-up policy. State-owned enterprises can function as an instrument to enforce government policies. Using data from the China General Social Survey, we evaluate the role and effectiveness of state-owned enterprises in enforcing the one child policy and affecting people’s fertility decisions. The estimates show that the one child policy in China significantly reduced people’s fertility for those working in state-owned enterprises than in non-state-owned firms. The findings are not driven by different fertility desires or other confounding events such as the opening-up policy. Such insights have valuable implications for the enforcement of population policies around the globe.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
