Abstract

The aim of this study is to set out the main principles with regard to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under Turkish law, and to question the main impediments that prevent enforcement. In this framework, prominent judgments of the Turkish Supreme Court and the approach of the Turkish legal doctrine are analysed in a holistic manner. We first consider whether the New York Convention or the Turkish Code on Private International Law should prevail when rendering an enforcement judgment. After this, we aim to explain how the conditions for enforcement should be interpreted according to the general characteristics and the main structure of international arbitration law. In this regard, the amendments brought in by the recent Turkish Code on Private International Law are scrutinised in order to reveal whether they give rise to a more arbitration-friendly climate. As a result, it will become easier to foresee the points which should be considered in obtaining an arbitral award that might be enforced in Turkey.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.