Abstract
ABSTRACTIn recent years, the misappropriation of corporate assets by 1MDB, a high-profile Malaysian company, has precipitated international investigations by regulatory authorities. Although the scandal resulted in the imprisonment of Singaporean bankers, for many years no enforcement proceedings were taken against the directors of 1MDB in Malaysia despite the existence of corporate law modelled substantially on Anglo-Australian law. The article investigates the enforcement of directors’ duties in Malaysia and seeks to explain the manner and extent to which regulatory safeguards against the expropriation of corporate property are enforced. The analysis draws from the Australian experience to illuminate the differences across jurisdictions. Features of the Malaysian context are examined to explain differences in the enforcement of directors’ duties across countries. The findings reveal the significance of the politics-business nexus, corporate ownership structures and cultural norms for the enforcement of corporate law. The implications of the Malaysian experience are considered within a broader regional context.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.