Abstract

Section 86 of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA) provides for the debt relief mechanism envisaged in section 3(g) of the Act by affording the overindebted consumer the opportunity to apply to a debt counsellor for a review of the credit agreements to which he or she is a party and eventually to be declared over-indebted by the court. The effectiveness of the debt review process obviously depends on a positive working relationship between all role players, namely the over-indebted consumer, credit providers and debt counsellor, but also on the extent in which the legislator has succeeded to regulate all aspects of the said process properly. According to a recent newspaper report more than 58 000 consumers have applied for debt review in terms of section 86. However, hardly any of these cases have managed to proceed through our courts. Apart from the lack of co-operation between the said role players, it iscommonly accepted that legislative gaps contribute to the ineffectiveness of the debt counselling process. In First Rand Bank v Smith (unreported case no 24208/08 (WLD)) the court, however, indicated a lacuna in the Act which, it is submitted, was not in actual factpresent in the Act.

Highlights

  • The effectiveness of the debt review process obviously depends on a positive working relationship between all role players, namely the over-indebted consumer, credit providers and debt counsellor, and on the extent in which the legislator has succeeded to regulate all aspects of the said process properly

  • According to a recent newspaper report (“Hulp Met Skuld Sukkel Nog” 5 May 2009 Sake Rapport 8) more than 58 000 consumers have applied for debt review in terms of section 86

  • Apart from the lack of co-operation between the said role players, it is commonly accepted that legislative gaps contribute to the ineffectiveness of the debt counselling process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since section 88(3) is subject to section 86(10) it is submitted that the credit provider may proceed with the enforcement of the specific credit agreement after the credit provider has given notice to terminate the review in terms of section 86(10) even though the events contemplated in section 88(1)(a) through (c) have not occurred. The facts and decision in Smith will be analysed and commented on with a view to interpret the Act’s provisions regarding the power of a credit provider to approach the court to enforce a credit agreement in instances where a consumer has consulted a debt counsellor

Facts and decision
Interpretation of relevant provisions of the Act and concluding remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call