Abstract

The Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocol is the most important part of any network, and is considered to be a fundamental protocol that aids in enhancing the performance of networks and communications. However, the MAC protocol’s design for underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) has introduced various challenges. This is due to long underwater acoustic propagation delay, high mobility, low available bandwidth, and high error probability. These unique acoustic channel characteristics make contention-based MAC protocols significantly more expensive than other protocol contentions. Therefore, re-transmission and collisions should effectively be managed at the MAC layer to decrease the energy cost and to enhance the network’s throughput. Consequently, handshake-based and random access-based MAC protocols do not perform as efficiently as their achieved performance in terrestrial networks. To tackle this complicated problem, this paper surveys the current collision-free MAC protocols proposed in the literature for UWSNs. We first review the unique characteristic of underwater sensor networks and its negative impact on the MAC layer. It is then followed by a discussion about the problem definition, challenges, and features associated with the design of MAC protocols in UWANs. Afterwards, currently available collision-free MAC design strategies in UWSNs are classified and investigated. The advantages and disadvantages of each design strategy along with the recent advances are then presented. Finally, we present a qualitative comparison of these strategies and also discuss some possible future directions.

Highlights

  • Underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) have been considered to be a powerful technology to observe and explore lakes, rivers, seas, and oceans

  • Contention-free, communication channels are separated into frequency, code domains, and time such as Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), and Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) [17,32]

  • Since underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) are distributed in three-dimensions (3D), unlike terrestrial networks, sensor nodes move with the water current. 3D mobile nodes in medium access control can make difficulties for allowing sensor nodes to access the communication channel

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) have been considered to be a powerful technology to observe and explore lakes, rivers, seas, and oceans. Underwater environments have certain physical restrictions and distinctive features, which should be considered during the development of Medium Access Control (MAC) protocols These include slow propagation delay, low available bandwidth, energy limitations, sensors movements in water current, and high deployment expenses. Since the contention-based MAC protocols are expensive in UWSNs, the collisionfree MAC protocols guarantee to achieve a high performance (i.e., improving the energy efficiency, throughput, and fairness) [12,30,31] In this category, contention-free, communication channels are separated into frequency, code domains, and time such as Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), and Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) [17,32].

Characteristics of Underwater Sensor Networks
Node Movement in Three-Dimensionality Area
Impact of High Propagation Delays on MAC Protocols
Impacts of Low Available Bandwidth on MAC Protocols
Acoustic Noises
Path Loss
High Energy Cost
Problem Definition and Challenges
Hidden Terminal Problem
Exposed Terminal Problem
Spatial-Temporal Uncertainty Problem
Near and Far Problem
Synchronisation
Centralisation
Duty Cycle Mechanism
Classification of Underwater Collision-Free MAC Protocols
Centralised
Distributed
Qualitative Comparison
Findings
Conclusions and Open Research
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call