Energy use of piperazine with the advanced stripper from pilot plant testing

Abstract

Piperazine with the Advanced Stripper (PZAS™) was tested at the National Carbon Capture Center (NCCC) at coal and NGCC conditions. Energy performance was measured with accounting for heat loss. The net heat duty was found to be identical at 2.45 GJ/tonne for both 4 and 12% CO2 at 90% CO2 removal. The average measured heat loss was 0.38 GJ/tonne and represented 30% of the gross heat rate. For PZAS, the warm rich piping before the control valve is the largest in surface area. Heat loss at this location increased heat duty by 80% of the heat loss value. Therefore, the total heat duty was decreased by 80% of the heat loss. The Independence™ model was validated using 112 steady-state pilot plant runs and predicted average net heat duty with an error of 9% and lean loading with an error of 10%.The model was used to simulate process impacts of heat loss for the PZAS and simple stripper configurations. For both strippers, heat loss was found to impact heat duty at locations other than just the steam heater. While heat loss in the steam heater was the most important for PZAS, heat loss in the column was the most important for the simple stripper due to a large top-side pinch and CO2 reabsorption at the same location. CO2 reabsorption in PZAS occurred only at high heat loss values (∼0.14 GJ/hr), compared to low heat loss values (∼ 0.03 GJ/hr) in the PZ-simple stripper. Excessive packing in the PZ-simple stripper caused a large top-side pinch at 0.23 mol/mol lean loading, making the column very sensitive to heat loss. Heat loss in the PZ-simple stripper increased heat duty by 120–150% at typical heat loss values and lean loading of 0.23 mol/mol. Heat loss in the MEA-simple stripper only increased heat duty by 1–13% in a typical lean loading range of 0.1–0.2 mol/mol. A large bottom side pinch at low lean loading for 7 m MEA made the effect of heat loss less pronounced.