Energy transitions in a post-war setting

Abstract

The puzzle this chapter seeks to unravel is why renewable energy projects in post-war societies encounter resistance even though they are clean and green. Using Sri Lanka as a case study, this chapter argues that in a post-war setting, energy equity and justice need particular attention since memories of conflict remain fresh, and wounds remain unhealed. Even though there is an urgency for energy transitions, energy justice should be the priority in order to achieve longstanding solutions acceptable by all in the post-war settings. Energy projects, which are often sensitive in the light of post-war realities, can reopen old wounds and new conflicts, undermining well-intentioned efforts towards energy transitions. Energy inequity, injustice and vulnerability are more complex than matters of prices and income and involve structural differences that have evolved over time and space. Prioritising justice will create a sense of security; acceptance and ownership in deeply divided post-war societies. To be sustainable and successful, energy projects as technocratic interventions must take note of justice, equity and democracy concerns in post-war settings.