Abstract

This work discusses quantitative aspects of energy transfer occurring in sol−gel derived organic−inorganic di-ureasil hybrids incorporating either [Eu(btfa)3(4,4‘-bpy)(EtOH)] (btfa = benzoyltrifluoroacetonate, 4,4‘-bpy = 4,4‘-bipyridine) or Eu(CF3SO3)3. Host-to-Eu3+ energy transfer occurs either via ligand singlet and triplet (T) excited states or directly from the hybrid emitting centers through the dipole−dipole, dipole−2λ pole (λ = 2, 4, and 6) and exchange mechanisms. This latter process is dominant for all discussed energy transfer pathways. The ligand-to-Eu3+ energy transfer rate is typically 1 order of magnitude larger than the value estimated for direct hybrid-to-Eu3+ transfer (3.75 × 1010 and 3.26 × 109 s-1, respectively, to the 5D1 level). The most efficient luminescence channel is (S0)Hybrid → (T)Hybrid → (T)Ligand → (5D1, 5D0) → 7F0-6. The predicted emission quantum yield of the di-ureasil incorporating [Eu(btfa)3(4,4‘-bpy)(EtOH)] is in excellent agreement with the corresponding experimental value (53 and 50 ± 5%, respectively), pointing out that the optimization of the ground state geometry by the Sparkle/AM1 model can, under certain conditions, be implemented in Eu3+-based organic−inorganic hybrids. For di-ureasils incorporating Eu(CF3SO3)3, the energy transfer rates could not be quantitatively predicted because of the higher computational effort necessary for calculating the singlet and triplet excited states in complex structures, such as these di-ureasils. Instead, the classic Förster and Dexter approaches were applied. Although less efficient, as compared with the di-ureasil incorporating [Eu(btfa)3(4,4‘-bpy)(EtOH)], the hybrid-to-Eu3+ energy transfer is also dominated by the exchange (Dexter) interaction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call