Abstract

This paper focuses on pricing Energy Storage as a Service (ESaaS) for Transmission congestion relief (TCR). We consider a merchant storage facility that competes in an electricity market to trade energy and ancillary services on a day-to-day basis. The facility also has the opportunity to provide a firm TCR service to a regional network operator under a long-term contract. Providing the additional TCR service would impose limitations on the facility's ability to fully harvest daily market trade opportunities. Thus, we model the opportunity costs associated with the TCR service and use it in a hybrid cost-value customized pricing technique to determine the risk-constrained optimal price of ESaaS for TCR. Given the long-term nature of the commitment to provide the TCR service, we use the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) metric to mitigate the long-term financial risks faced by the facility. The proposed pricing strategy enables the storage owner to estimate the additional financial gains and the associated risks that would likely result from adding the new service to its operation. Numerical simulations are provided to support the proposed methodology.

Highlights

  • A PPLYING large-scale energy storage systems (ESSs) in the electrical power sector is not a new concept [1]

  • We propose to apply the concept of Energy Storage as a Service (ESaaS) for Transmission Congestion Relief (TCR)

  • We propose to use the opportunity costs model in a risk-constrained hybrid cost-value customized technique to optimally price the facility’s Transmission congestion relief (TCR) service such that (i) it has a chance of getting accepted in the auction, and (ii), if accepted, it is predictably likely that the associated financial compensations cover the aforementioned opportunity costs and yield additional profits

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A PPLYING large-scale energy storage systems (ESSs) in the electrical power sector is not a new concept [1]. According to the latest data from the US Department of Energy, as of early 2020, more than 87% of existing energy storage projects in the world are somehow directly linked to renewable energy integration [4]. The same source reveals that close to 99% of the existing ESS projects are employed within the supply-side of interconnected power grids to provide energy or ancillary services [4]. Eyer and Corey [6] argue that in certain cases, a storage system with a relatively small capacity could be used to provide enough incremental capacity to defer the need for a large investment in T&D systems

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call