Abstract

Accessibility to modern energy services is imperative in resolving numerous present-day global development issues which affect people’s socio-economic and physical well-being, plus, the potentiality of meeting the global goals of lessening carbon emissions. The absence of access, termed energy poverty in developing countries, has several key aspects: inaccessibility to electricity on demand, is one aspect. However, inaccessibility to modern (or clean) cooking fuels is another critical aspect. A cause and effect of households’ continuous heavy reliance on traditional (or solid) fuels. Despite over a third of the global population having this issue, this aspect of energy poverty continues to be a severe, yet overlooked development issue: particularly in developing countries. A review of literature shows that there are currently no empirical studies which quantify the sole relationship between the utilization of traditional energy fuels for cooking and/or heating and economic development. Thus, in this paper, we advance existing literature in multiple-folds. Firstly, we provide a review in an absent area of literature. Secondly, using the data from 46 sub-Saharan African countries, we provide empirical evidence of the impacts of the continued utilization of traditional fuels on economic development (employing Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per Capita as variable). Following the establishment of a negative causal relationship running from traditional fuels use (solid) to GDP per capita, we provide an insight into policy implications. Finally, we comment on potential policy strategies.

Highlights

  • In response to this, scientific and policy attention have focussed on matters of accessibility, equity and investment in socialtechnical systems linked to modern energy supply

  • In 2016, the continent contributed to only 6% of the total global energy consumption, Africa contributed to almost 29% of the global biofuels consumption [41]

  • For the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) variable, at level, the null hypothesis of a unit root cannot be rejected at 1% and 5% significance levels for all tests; excluding the Hadri and Heteroscedastic consistent z-stat tests which have the null hypotheses of no unit root

Read more

Summary

Conclusions

EC ) GDP (Algeria, Congo DR, Egypt, Ghana and Ivory Coast) EC 4 GDP (Gabon and Zambia) EC P GDP (Benin, Congo RP, Kenya, Senegal, South Africa, Sudan, Togo, Tunisia and Zimbabwe) EC P GDP (Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Nigeria and Togo). Far, many studies have primarily focused on either the general energy - economic development connection or on the explicit connection between electricity and economic development [36]. Electricity consumption; GDP Electricity consumption; GDP Electricity consumption; GDP Electricity consumption; GDP Electricity consumption; GDP Electricity consumption; GDP Electricity consumption; GDP. Johansen-Juselius; Cointegration; VEC; cofeature analysis Granger causality; ECM

African countries
Literature review
Energy-economic development nexus in sub-Saharan Africa
Solid fuel and GDP in sub-Saharan Africa
Data and methodology
Methodology
Panel unit roots results
Panel cointegration results
Long run cointegration results
Panel granger causality results
Conclusion and policy implications
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.