Energy optimization of stand-alone electrical grid considering the optimal performance of the hydrogen storage system and consumers

Abstract

The surge in energy storage systems and the increasing involvement of demand-side participation can be attributed to their favorable characteristics, including their seamless integration into electrical networks and their capacity to offer operational flexibility during critical periods. This scholarly article focuses on enhancing energy utilization in an autonomous electrical grid by incorporating hydrogen storage and demand-side participation. The optimization of the stand-alone electrical grid is based on maximizing efficiency and minimizing energy consumption costs as the main objective functions are modeled. The modeling efficiency is formulated considering the ratio of the energy not supplied (ENS) to energy generation by resources. And costs of energy consumption are modeled as consumption of fuel costs by resources. The consumers’ participation is proposed based on an incentive approach to consumers for demand shaving in peak times. Also, the hydrogen storage system is installed in the stand-alone electrical grid to improve the main objectives. The particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for energy optimization and solving objective functions is applied. In the end, numerical simulation is carried out in some case studies to confirm and supremacy of energy optimization with the participation of the hydrogen storage system and consumers. The case studies based on non-participation and participation of the storage system and consumers in energy management are implemented. The implementation of case studies examines the impact of both non-participation and participation of the storage system and consumers in energy management. The findings reveal that when the storage system and consumers actively participate, there is a significant improvement in efficiency and a substantial reduction in energy costs. Specifically, the efficiency is enhanced by 3% and the energy costs are reduced by 29.5% compared to the scenario where they do not participate.