Abstract
AbstractThe symmetry‐adapted formalism and the weak‐field model described in the first three papers of this series are applied to the case of a configuration nfN in octahedral symmetry. In this case, the latter weakfield model is restricted to a 30‐parameter model which accounts for isotropic and anisotropic Coulomb (repulsion) interactions, isotropic and anisotropic spin‐orbit interactions, and crystal‐field interactions. A comparison between this 30‐parameter weak‐field model and a 33‐parameter strong‐field model is established. Equivalence between these two models requires three constraint relations to be satisfied for some strong‐field parameters. The three relations are examined on various viewpoints.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
