Abstract

To facilitate the energy transition, regulators can choose between several policy options to stimulate energy-efficient design by firms. One possibility is to target firms directly through standards or subsidies. Alternatively, it is possible to influence firms indirectly by targeting firms’ stakeholders and raising consumer awareness through information campaigns and education. In this paper, we focus specifically on the pivotal role of consumers and we investigate the effectiveness of subsidies, product standards, and education in improving firms’ environmental performance through energy-efficient product design. In particular, we investigate the importance of the interaction effect between the regulation and consumers’ environmental awareness under different market structures. We find that a policy based on a product standard can counteract the negative effects of crowding-out consumers’ intrinsic motivation in a monopoly setting, although this counteracting effect is less powerful under a duopoly. However, a subsidy does not provide such a backup system and the full effect of crowding-out will be visible.

Highlights

  • Citizens and governments are increasingly worried about satisfying societal needs without exceeding our planetary boundaries (Raworth 2017)

  • We find that a policy based on a product standard can counteract the negative effects of crowding-out consumers’ intrinsic motivation in a monopoly setting, this counteracting effect is less powerful under a duopoly

  • The energy transition plays a crucial role in this evolution as ‘access to clean, affordable and reliable energy has been a cornerstone of the world’s increasing prosperity and economic growth’ (Chu and Majumdar 2012, p. 294) or as Peter Voser as CEO of Royal Dutch Shell said ‘energy is the oxygen of the economy’ (World Economic Forum 2012, p. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Citizens and governments are increasingly worried about satisfying societal needs without exceeding our planetary boundaries (Raworth 2017). We investigate the importance of the interaction effect between the regulation and consumers’ environmental awareness To this end, we first consider a base model where a monopolist chooses prices and product energy efficiency under four different scenarios: (1) a baseline laissez-faire scenario, (2) an education-based policy, (3) a product standard, and (4) a technology subsidy. Other related works are Espinola-Arredondo and Zhao (2012), who investigate how a tax/subsidy policy can promote the consumption of green products in the context of horizontal product differentiation; Casino and Granero (2018), who model the market entry decision as well as the product differentiation decision in a spokes model with a large number of potential varieties; or Rodriguez Ibeas (2007), who consider a vertical differentiation model to analyze the effect of (exogenous) changes in consumer awareness on social welfare.

Base model
Firm behavior under laissez-faire
Policy scenarios
Raising awareness
Product standard
Technology subsidy
Adding competition
Simultaneous choices under laissez-faire
Sequential choices under laissez-faire
Conclusions
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call