Abstract

Industrially developed and trade dependent states may be especially hard hit by international economic crises. It appears that such states’ governmental response to crises will depend on: traditions of economic planning; international trade and political connections; political pressures within the state; and traditions of business‐government relations. These factors determine the mix of direct planned government intervention, reliance on private industry, or disjointed bureaucratic regulations in crisis. Sweden and Holland utilized all three approaches during the 1973–74 oil crisis. The Swedish government intervened more directly and the Dutch relied more on multinational oil companies and a series of ad hoc regulations. The Netherlands’ greater diplomatic and economic leverage conditioned the somewhat less assertive government response.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.