Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the energy cost across various intensities at eight popular resistance exercises: half squat, 45° inclined leg press, leg extension, horizontal bench press, 45° inclined bench press, lat pull down, triceps extension and biceps curl. 58 males (27.5 ± 4.9 years, 1.78 ± 0.06 m height, 78.67 ± 10.7 kg body mass and 11.4 ± 4.1% estimated body fat) were randomly divided into four groups of 14 subjects each. For each group, two exercises were randomly assigned and on different days, they performed four bouts of 5-min constant-intensity for each of the two assigned exercises: 12%, 16%, 20% and 24% 1-RM. Later, the subjects performed exhaustive bouts at 80% 1-RM in the same two exercises. The mean values of VO2 at the last 30s of exercise at 12, 16, 20 and 24% 1-RM bouts were plotted against relative intensity (% 1-RM) in a simple linear regression mode. The regressions were then used to predict O2 demand for the higher intensity (80% 1-RM). Energy cost rose linearly with exercise intensity in every exercise with the lowest mean values were found in biceps curl and the highest in half squat exercise (p<0.001). Half squat exercise presented significant (p<0.001) higher values of energy cost in all intensities, when compared with the remaining exercises. This study revealed that low-intensity resistance exercise provides energy cost comprised between 3 and 10 kcal∙min-1. Energy cost rose past 20 kcal∙min-1 at 80% 1-RM in leg exercise. In addition, at 80% 1-RM, it was found that upper body exercises are less anaerobic than lower-body exercises.

Highlights

  • Resistance exercise (RE) has been progressively more and more popular and is included in programs which are designed to address weight loss and to target recommended energy cost values [1]

  • Comparisons of the excess-post exercise oxygen consumption in RE, with that involved in typical aerobics, showed higher magnitude in RE [3], which contributed to this belief

  • Past research has addressed the energy costs involved in programs were RE and aerobics combined in the same session, with mean values of 6–7 kcal.min-1 while performing the RE, and of 12–14 kcalÁmin-1 while performing the aerobics [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Estimates of the energy cost at RE usually reflect mean values during a whole exercise session (thereby including exercise and recovery periods), ranging considerable between 3 and 11 kcalÁmin-1 in adult males [4,5,6,7] This large variability is explained by the amount of possible combinations of different exercises, movement cadences, intensities, number of repetitions and the type of equipment that is used (i.e. machines vs free weights) [8]. Past research has addressed the energy costs involved in programs were RE and aerobics combined in the same session, with mean values of 6–7 kcal.min-1 while performing the RE, and of 12–14 kcalÁmin-1 while performing the aerobics [7] This is a popular type of program which seems to match most of the populations attending fitness centres. A common ground among the aforementioned studies is the use of typical high-intensity loads (above 70% 1-RM) performed until exhaustion

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call