Energy consumption and thermal comfort of rock-cut and modern buildings

Abstract

Energy consumption in the building sector justifies the necessity of knowing the thermal comfort perception of vernacular and modern architectural types, based on which a correct recognition was reached for the design of buildings suitable for the climatic conditions of each region. It should be determined that the different types of modern and traditional architecture are in the comfort level in harsh hot climate conditions and how much energy they consume to reach the comfort level. Despite consideration of energy consumption and thermal comfort in different buildings in Iran, there is no clear framework for evaluating these two parameters in different buildings and comparing them. This research aims to compare the indoor thermal comfort levels of vernacular architectural buildings and modern buildings in Iran's semi-hot and dry climate at the peak of summer heat and determine their energy consumption to reach the comfort level. This study has been accomplished by collecting field data, examining the indoor predicted mean vote (PMV) index of the buildings, and comparing them. It was found that rock-cut architecture buildings are in better thermal comfort conditions without energy consumption due to the use of groundmass temperature and low heat exchanges between the indoors and outdoors because of the thermal phase of the materials and the thickness of its layers. The indoor PMV average of rock-cut buildings in summer is −0.61; in modern buildings, it is 0.77, while these two building complexes are in the same climate and close. Also, the energy consumption to reach the comfort level in rock-cut buildings is zero, while modern buildings consume an average of 7.7 kW of electricity daily. The research results will lead to recognizing and modeling the climate design of vernacular architecture, which can be used in today's architecture to reduce energy consumption.