Abstract

The issues of energy consumption and CO2 emissions of major ironmaking processes, including several new technologies, are assessed. These two issues are interconnected in that the production and use of fuels to generate energy add to the total amount of CO2 emissions and the efforts to sequester or convert CO2 require energy. The amounts of emissions and energy consumption in alternate ironmaking processes are compared with those for the blast furnace, currently the dominant ironmaking process. Although more than 90% of iron production is currently through the blast furnace, intense efforts are devoted to developing alternative technologies. Recent developments in alternate ironmaking processes, which are largely driven by the needs to decrease CO2 emissions and energy consumption, are discussed in this article. This discussion will include the description of the recently developed novel flash ironmaking technology. This technology bypasses the cokemaking and pelletization/sintering steps, which are pollution prone and energy intensive, by using iron ore concentrate. This transformational technology renders large energy saving and decreased CO2 emissions compared with the blast furnace process. Economic analysis indicated that this new technology, when operated using natural gas, would be economically feasible. As a related topic, we will also discuss different methods for computing process energy and total energy requirements in ironmaking.

Highlights

  • The blast furnace (BF), direct reduction (DR), and recently developed smelting reduction (SR) make up major ironmaking processes currently practiced in industry

  • The current DR technologies based on shaft furnaces, rotary kilns, and fluidized bed reactors suffer from drawbacks such as a low energy efficiency when applied in a small scale, requirement for pelletization, and the fact that the produced direct reduced iron (DRI) is pyrophoric and tends to re-oxidize

  • These authors constructed the flow sheet for an industrial-scale plant based on the Flash Ironmaking Technology and carried out detailed material and energy balances. They calculated the net present value (NPV) after a 15-year operation. These results suggested that the flash ironmaking process would be economical if it is operated with natural gas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The blast furnace (BF), direct reduction (DR), and recently developed smelting reduction (SR) make up major ironmaking processes currently practiced in industry. Other gas-based processes developed for the reduction of iron oxide but have been less adopted are the fluidized-bed processes FINMET, earlier FIOR [7], CIRCORED [8] and SPIREX [9] These processes use iron ore fines, which are particles of +0.1 mm to −10 mm sizes, and provide low production rates because the particles in this size range react slowly. The main feature of SR is that pre-reduced iron ore is reduced by char generated from coal by in situ devolatilization to form molten metal and slag This process bypasses cokemaking and requires less charge preparation, but usually needs a pre-reduction step. The melter-gasifier part is essentially the same in the two processes

Technical Issues
Energy Requirements
Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Background
Reduction Kinetics of Concentrate Particles
Laboratory Flash Reactor
Experiments with Hydrogen
Experiments with Methane
Mini-Pilot Reactor Testing
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation
Economic Analysis
Findings
Concluding Remarks
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call