Abstract
Research has demonstrated that many students and some teachers do not consistently apply the conservation of energy principle when analyzing mechanical scenarios. In observing elementary and secondary teachers engaged in learning activities that require tracking and conserving energy, we find that challenges to energy conservation often arise in dissipative scenarios in which kinetic energy transforms into thermal energy (e.g., a ball rolls to a stop). We find that teachers expect that when they can see the motion associated with kinetic energy, they should be able to perceive the warmth associated with thermal energy. Their expectations are violated when the warmth produced is imperceptible. In these cases, teachers reject the idea that the kinetic energy transforms to thermal energy. Our observations suggest that apparent difficulties with energy conservation may have their roots in a strong and productive association between forms of energy and their perceptible indicators. We see teachers resolve these challenges by relating the original scenario to an exaggerated version in which the dissipated thermal energy is associated with perceptible warmth. Using these exaggerations, teachers infer that thermal energy is present to a lesser degree in the original scenario. They use this exaggeration strategy to productively track and conserve energy in dissipative scenarios.
Highlights
The Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1] emphasize the importance of tracking and conserving energy through physical scenarios [2]
It follows that a person who accepts that energy is conserved would expect the perceptibility of that energy’s indicators to be “conserved.” For example, in the scenario of a ball rolling to a stop, the disappearance of a perceptible indicator without replacement by another perceptible indicator can seem to suggest the disappearance of energy and a violation of the principle of energy conservation
Changes in mechanical energy of about 1 J may be associated with perceptible indicators, but if all of that energy were transformed to thermal energy, it would only increase the temperature of a typical room (50 m3) by an imperceptible 10−5 K (10−5°F)
Summary
The Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [1] emphasize the importance of tracking and conserving energy through physical scenarios [2]. For example, changes in height and speed of the rollercoaster are the perceptible indicators used to track energy as it transforms from gravitational energy to kinetic energy This method of tracking energy by its perceptible indicators is useful in idealized scenarios that neglect dissipative processes (e.g., a rollercoaster moving on a frictionless track). Learners expect that kinetic energy associated with visible motion will transform into thermal energy associated with palpable warmth This expectation challenges their commitment to energy conservation when all energy indicators disappear from perception. Learners accept the presence of thermal energy in a rollercoaster scenario when they recognize that warmth is perceptible in a space-shuttle re-entry scenario We support these claims by first describing the physics of energy dissipation and the perceptibility of indicators of energy forms (Sec. II).
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Dissipative Scenarios
Thermal Energy
Teacher Expectations
Energy Conservation
Original Scenario
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
arXiv: Physics Education
Oct 1, 2014
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Mar 1, 2017
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Feb 1, 2019
arXiv: Astrophysics
Jun 17, 1997
The Astrophysical Journal
Jun 10, 1998
Journal of Petroleum Technology
Jul 1, 1984
Nuclear Physics A
Aug 4, 1997
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Oct 1, 2011
International Journal of Food Studies
Apr 13, 2018
International Journal of Food Studies
Apr 13, 2018
Choice Reviews Online
Mar 1, 1997
Applied Surface Science
May 1, 2022
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Feb 28, 2016
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Feb 22, 2016
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Feb 18, 2016
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Feb 18, 2016
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Feb 18, 2016
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Feb 18, 2016
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Dec 29, 2015
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Dec 29, 2015
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Dec 21, 2015
Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research
Nov 25, 2015