Energy Budgeting, Data Envelopment Analysis and Greenhouse Gas Emission from Rice Production System: A Case Study from Puddled Transplanted Rice and Direct-Seeded Rice System of Karnataka, India

Kariyaiah Basavalingaiah,Hosam O Elansary,Y M Ramesha,S Raveesha,Venkatesh Paramesh,H C Girisha,G A Rajanna,T K Roopa,Diaa O El-Ansary,Shankar Lal Jat,Ashok Kumar Gaddi,K S Shashidhar,Shiva Dhar Misra,Bipin Kumar,G S Yogesh

doi:10.3390/su12166439

Abstract

The energy consumption pattern and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission of any rice production system is important to know the sustainability of varied cultivation and establishment technique. This study was conducted to determine the energy use pattern, GHG emission and efficiency of rice farms in puddled transplanted (PTR, rainfed) and direct-seeded rice (DSR, irrigated) production systems in Karnataka, India. The energy indices and GHG emission of different input and output in a rice production system were assessed by using energy and carbon equivalence. The efficiency of PTR and DSR farms were identified using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and energy optimization was ascertained. The key finding was excessive use of non-renewable energy inputs was observed for the PTR (92.4%) compare to DSR (60.3%) methods. The higher energy use efficiency (7.3), energy productivity (0.3 kg MJ−1) and energy profitability (6.3) were mainly attributed to the large decrease in energy inputs under DSR. The DEA showed efficiency for 26 PTR farms in comparison for 87 DSR farms. The mean technical efficiency value highlighted the scope for saving energy by 6% and 2% in PTR and DSR, respectively and showed an economic reduction of $405.5/ha with PTR versus $163.3/ha with the DSR method if these inefficient farms perform efficiently. The GHG emissions revealed that the total emissions for PTR versus DSR production caused by on-farm emissions were 86% and 65%, respectively. The DSR method also had a higher carbon efficiency ratio and carbon sustainability index (10.1 and 9.1, respectively). Thus, adoption of DSR method is imperative for reduction of energy consumption and GHG emissions to achieve the carbon sustainability.

Highlights

The demand for food production in developing countries has increased tremendously concurrent with technological advancement using non-renewable energy resources such as fossil fuel, machinery, fertilizers and pesticides [1]
Mechanization was a significant share of input in PTR, and more tillage operations were needed in this transplanted method of cultivation, which contributed to higher share of input in PTR versus DSR method
The higher energy use efficiency (EUE), EP and EFP were primarily attributed to the huge gap in energy inputs under DSR method

Summary

Introduction

The demand for food production in developing countries has increased tremendously concurrent with technological advancement using non-renewable energy resources such as fossil fuel, machinery, fertilizers and pesticides [1]. This increased production has put constant pressure on natural resources, which in turn has jeopardized the agricultural sustainability. Rice is the staple crop of Karnataka, India, and the rice farmers have adopted extensive use of non-renewable inputs and generally cultivate nutrientand irrigation-responsive high-yield varieties. The GHG emission is mainly influenced by the type of inputs used for production, such as fertilizers, pesticides, organic manure, fossil fuels, machinery and irrigation methods [4]. The rice cultivation in hilly region of Karnataka is characterized by either direct-seeded rice (DSR, irrigated) or puddled transplanted rice (PTR, rainfall), whereas the approach to paddy cultivation is typically a PTR-based system with heavier use of agricultural inputs than in the hilly region

Methods

Results

Conclusion