Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to review the application of complexity science methods in understanding energy systems and system change. The challenge of moving to sustainable energy systems which provide secure, affordable and low-carbon energy services requires the application of methods which recognise the complexity of energy systems in relation to social, technological, economic and environmental aspects. Energy systems consist of many actors, interacting through networks, leading to emergent properties and adaptive and learning processes. Insights on these type of phenomena have been investigated in other contexts by complex systems theory. However, these insights are only recently beginning to be applied to understanding energy systems and systems transitions.The paper discusses the aspects of energy systems (in terms of technologies, ecosystems, users, institutions, business models) that lend themselves to the application of complexity science and its characteristics of emergence and coevolution. Complex-systems modelling differs from standard (e.g. economic) modelling and offers capabilities beyond those of conventional models, yet these methods are only beginning to realize anything like their full potential to address the most critical energy challenges. In particular there is significant potential for progress in understanding those challenges that reside at the interface of technology and behaviour. Some of the computational methods that are currently available are reviewed: agent-based and network modelling. The advantages and limitations of these modelling techniques are discussed.Finally, the paper considers the emerging themes of transport, energy behaviour and physical infrastructure systems in recent research from complex-systems energy modelling. Although complexity science is not well understood by practitioners in the energy domain (and is often difficult to communicate), models can be used to aid decision-making at multiple levels e.g. national and local, and to aid understanding and allow decision making. The techniques and tools of complexity science, therefore, offer a powerful means of understanding the complex decision-making processes that are needed to realise a low-carbon energy system. We conclude with recommendations for future areas of research and application.
Highlights
Synergies between energy systems and complex systemsSystems theory is well-established in engineering and in biological and physical sciences because it is a convenient and useful way to see a whole as a collection of its interacting parts
Introduction to the SeriesIn: Peter BD, Dale WJ, editors
The purpose of this paper is to review the application of complexity science methods in understanding energy systems and system change
Summary
Systems theory is well-established in engineering and in biological and physical sciences because it is a convenient and useful way to see a whole as a collection of its interacting parts. The body of knowledge that is complex systems theory developed from the founding of the Santa Fe Institute to study common features of a range of systems that exhibit complexity. This builds upon systems theory by recognising further principles of the manifestation of systems, such as self-organisation, non-linearity, emergence and co-evolution [8,9,10]. Understanding these features and principles can aid the management of complex systems. We explain why we think understanding energy systems requires an alternative approach and how we can use complexity science to do this
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.