Energetics of the native and non‐native states of the glycophorin transmembrane helix dimer

Abstract

Using an implicit membrane model (IMM1), we examine whether the structure of the transmembrane domain of Glycophorin A (GpA) could be predicted based on energetic considerations alone. The energetics of native GpA shows that van der Waals interactions make the largest contribution to stability. Although specific electrostatic interactions are stabilizing, the overall electrostatic contribution is close to zero. The GXXXG motif contributes significantly to stability, but residues outside this motif contribute almost twice as much. To generate non-native states a global conformational search was done on two segments of GpA: an 18-residue peptide (GpA74-91) that is embedded in the membrane and a 29-residue peptide (GpA70-98) that has additional polar residues flanking the transmembrane region. Simulated annealing was done on a large number of conformations generated from parallel, antiparallel, left- and right-handed starting structures by rotating each helix at 20 degrees intervals around its helical axis. Several crossing points along the helix dimer were considered. For 18-residue parallel topology, an ensemble of native-like structures was found at the lowest effective energy region; the effective energy is lowest for a right-handed structure with an RMSD of 1.0 A from the solid-state NMR structure with correct orientation of the helices. For the 29-residue peptide, the effective energies of several left-handed structures were lower than that of the native, right-handed structure. This could be due to deficiencies in modeling the interactions between charged sidechains and/or omission of the sidechain entropy contribution to the free energy. For 18-residue antiparallel topology, both IMM1 and a Generalized Born model give effective energies that are lower than that of the native structure. In contrast, the Poisson-Boltzmann solvation model gives lower effective energy for the parallel topology, largely because the electrostatic solvation energy is more favorable for the parallel structure. IMM1 seems to underestimate the solvation free energy advantage when the CO and NH dipoles just outside the membrane are parallel. This highlights the importance of electrostatic interactions even when these are not obvious by looking at the structures.