Abstract

SummaryA comparison was made of the daily energy expenditure (DEE), resting metabolic rate (RMR) and water turnover (WTO) of two populations of Common Spiny MiceAcomys cahirinusfrom north‐ and south‐facing slopes (NFS and SFS) of the same valley, which represented ‘Mediterranean’ and ‘desert’ habitats, respectively.An examination was made as to whether these physiological characteristics differed between mice that had been in the laboratory (outdoor conditions) for 2 months compared with mice captured from the field.Mice from the field had greater RMR values than mice in the laboratory and NFS mice had greater RMR values than SFS mice. In the field, NFS individuals had greater DEE values than SFS individuals. Mass‐specific RMR values of SFS mice were 20% less than the allometrically predicted value, whereas those of NFS were not. WTO and sustained metabolic scope (DEE/RMR) were lower in the field than in the laboratory.The results indicate that physiological capabilities are phenotypically plastic, as differences exist between the field and laboratory and between NFS and SFS mice. Furthermore, they highlight the importance of using field studies for understanding the link between energetics and physiological adjustment to environmental conditions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call