Abstract

Active predators obtain energy and nutrients from prey through complex processes in which the energy gained must exceed the energy invested in finding and ingesting the prey. In addition, the amount of energy available will vary with the prey that are selected for consumption. The muricid gastropod Acanthina monodon inhabits rocky shores, where it routinely feeds on the mytilids Semimytilus algosus and Perumytilus purpuratus. In this study, S. algosus was highly preferred by the predator (over 90% were eaten) versus P. purpuratus (only 9% were eaten) when offered a mixed diet. The energetic cost of attacking one S. algosus individual was 91 J bivalve-1 while for P. purpuratus it was slightly higher: 95 J bivalve-1. Also, whereas A. monodon required on average 19 h to consume S. algosus, successful attacks on P. purpuratus required about 32% more time (25 h). In addition, a longer resting time was needed by the predator after preying on P. purpuratus before it initiated another attack. Moreover, the active metabolic costs associated with successfully attacking the prey increased 3.2 times over the basal metabolic costs when attacking S. algosus, but only by 2.5 times when attacking P. purpuratus. The calculations associated with preying on each species showed that the energetic gain per unit time likely accounts for the predator’s preference for attacking S. algosus, even though predation on both species provided net energy gains for the predator. However, as S. algosus occurs seasonally at our study site, P. purpuratus would probably also be consumed due to its constant availability throughout the whole year.

Highlights

  • The search for food by heterotrophic organisms may have a high energetic cost

  • The tight relationship established between shell length and biomass (g of dry weight) in the mussels S. algosus (y = 0.00003X2.48, R2 = 0.9714) and P. purpuratus (y = 0.00001X2.9191, R2 = 0.9909) enabled us to estimate the biomass of prey that were consumed in the experiments (Fig 2A and 2B)

  • Energy benefits were maximized by selecting particular prey species, suggesting that prey selection can be explained by the energetic benefits obtained

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The energetic costs of the feeding process become higher if prey present protective structures (e.g. shell valves or carapaces) that should be penetrated in order to consume their soft tissues [6]. Non-specific predators commonly consume organisms that differ in size, shape, soft tissues content, and the hardness and thickness of protective structures; one or more of these parameters may define the selection of one prey over another. This is probably related to a net balance between the energetic costs of attack and the energetic income from consuming a particular prey [6, 7, 10, 11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call