Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present a proposal for evaluating the coefficient of friction (COF), under a reciprocating test that considers the energy dissipated by the friction force. In addition, this new parameter is compared to average COF, which is often used to evaluate COF in reciprocating tests.Design/methodology/approachSamples of compacted graphite iron were extracted directly from an internal combustion engine block. The piston ring used was a nitrided martensitic stainless steel with an asymmetrical profile, and the lubricant oil was the SAE 30 CF, controlled at 40°C. Different testing conditions were carried out in a CETR-UMT-Bruker tribometer, varying loads between 25-125 N, frequencies between 1-12.5 Hz and track length between 3-10 mm. Three maps comparing the average COF and the energetic definition were built, allowing to discuss their similarities.FindingsIn general, both parameters had similarities especially for low frequencies and small tracks. However, for test conditions that imposed higher accelerations (i.e. longer track lengths and higher frequencies), the energetic COF (COFe) was lower than the average COF (COFa) and presented better agreement in Stribeck-like curves – independent on the experienced lubrication regime along the stroke. As the COFe can be interpreted as a weighted average of instantaneous COF in relation to in-track displacements, an immediate consequence is that instantaneous COF closest to mid-stroke is considered more significant. Furthermore, perturbations associated with the intrinsic accelerations of the movement test are minimized in the COFe formulation.Originality/valueThe energetic COF parameter (COFe) is presented and compared to the average COF. The new parameter presented less data dispersion and is attractive to evaluate the COF behavior in reciprocating tests, as its formulation minimizes perturbations associated with the intrinsic accelerations of the movement (mainly in the initial and final part of the track where the acceleration has its greatest magnitude).Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/ILT-08-2019-0324

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call