Abstract
Status 1A patients are prioritized over end-stage liver disease (ESLD) for liver transplantation (LT). ESLD patients with high MELD may have higher waitlist mortality than Status 1A patients, and may require LT more urgently. Using United Network for Organ Sharing registry data, we retrospectively evaluated LT waitlist mortality and probability of LT between adults in the United States with Status 1A or ESLD with MELD >30 listed for LT from 2003-2013. Overall waitlist mortality and probability of LT were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier and multivariate logistic regression models. From 2003-2013, 15,049 ESLD patients with MELD >30 and 3049 Status 1A patients were listed for LT. While overall 14-day waitlist survival decreased with increasing MELD score among ESLD patients (54.0% for MELD 31-35; 37.1% for MELD 36-40; 27.5% for MELD >40), overall survival at 14days was significantly lower among Status 1A (14.4%). Compared to Status 1A, ESLD patients with MELD >40 had significantly higher 14-day waitlist mortality (OR 1.92; 95% CI 1.56-2.36; p<0.001), whereas ESLD patients with MELD 36-40 had a non-significant trend towards higher waitlist mortality (OR 1.16; 95% CI 0.93-1.45; p=0.181). No difference in probability of LT within 14 days was observed between ESLD with MELD >40 and Status 1A (p=0.89). ESLD patients with MELD >40 had higher post-LT survival compared to Status 1A on multivariate regression modeling (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66-0.96; p<0.02). Among adults in the United States awaiting LT, ESLD patients with MELD >40 have significantly higher waitlist mortality, but similar probability of receiving LT compared to Status 1A patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.