Endovascular Treatment of Chronic Post-Dissection Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysms Using Inner Branch Device (Ibevar): A Preliminary Single Center Experience

Abstract

Abstract Background Although open surgery remains the gold standard for the treatment of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAAAs), the endovascular approach using fenestrated or branched endografts has emerged as a valid alternative for patients considered at high risk for surgery. The use of inner branch devices (iBEVAR) combining benefits of fenestrations and outer branches could offer an ideal configuration in this context. Aims Our aim was to report our preliminary monocentric experience with iBEVAR in the treatment of post-dissection TAAAs. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospective data retrieved from 1 center between Mars 2020 and January 2023 was done. Endpoints were immediate technical success, postoperative morbidity, rate of endoleaks, re-intervention and mortality. Results During this period, 18 patients (mean age 66,5 years, range 41-80) were identified. All were asymptomatic and operated in a 2-steps procedure with a TEVAR first. There were 5 off-the-shelf E-nside (28%) and 13 custom-made Extra-Design grafts (72%). Despite successful endograft deployment in all patients and branch catheterization in 68/70 cases (97%), the technical success was 94% due to an open conversion for ilio-mesenteric bypass. The 30-days mortality was 0%. During the post-operative period, 17% of patients (3/18) presented complications with 1 case of mesenteric ischaemia requiring a visceral resection and 2 cases of paralytic ileus, treated conservatively. No spinal cord ischemia was observed. During the median follow-up of 16 months (range 1-36), 4 patients (22%) had a re-intervention: one case of type-Ic endoleak treated with an additional renal stent and 3 cases of type-III endoleaks in the celiac trunk requiring a relining. The overall target vessel patency was 100%. In all cases, the sac diameter remained stable. Conclusions The use of iBEVAR appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of post-dissection TAAAs with an acceptable rate of complications. Further patients and longer follow-up are needed.