Endovascular Removal of Inferior Vena Cava Filters with Arterial Penetration

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the safety and outcomes of endovascular percutaneous removal of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) with elements penetrating an artery. Materials and MethodsFrom an IVCF retrieval database, computerized tomographic scans of patients who underwent IVCF retrieval from 2011 to 2017 were reviewed for IVCF elements penetrating through the caval wall and into an adjacent arterial wall (AW) or penetrating into an adjacent arterial lumen (AL). Forty-two patients were identified, including 20 with elements penetrating into an AW and 22 with elements penetrating into an AL; 30 of these IVCFs were tip embedded. ResultsAll of the filters in both groups were removed. Of the arterial-interacting filters, 9 were removed with the use of standard techniques and 33 with the use of endobronchial forceps. Arterial access was obtained before removal in 3 patients (7%) with post-removal arteriography revealing no abnormalities, such as extravasation, pseudoaneurysm, or new fractured components. There was no significant difference between groups in tip embedding, retrieval technique, or fluoroscopy time. ConclusionsEndovascular removal of IVCFs with elements that have penetrated into adjacent arterial walls or lumens can be performed safely in the majority of patients.